bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics76.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colori,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220406
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 11 '23 at 10:58
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E-2176G
None, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
79.1% Very good
Memory 77.5
1-Core 127
2-Core 233
81% 146 Pts
4-Core 453
8-Core 526
64% 490 Pts
64-Core 527
33% 527 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX A2000
Device(0000 0000)
Driver: Ver. 10.0.22621.1
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76.5% Very good
Lighting 98.8
Reflection 104
Parallax 85.5
80% 96.2 fps
MRender 110
Gravity 73.4
Splatting 74.1
69% 85.7 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 76%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Disco virtuale Microsoft 107GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 524 548 723 847 675 840 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 41% Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None 4GB
0, 0 MHz
3072, 1024 MB
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
77.1% Very good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 25.6
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 22.4
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 85.2
47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 64 0" 1296 768 MSH062E HyperVMonitor
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,555 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $60
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback