MSI B450 Tomahawk

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics91.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 Tomahawk  (all builds)
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181106
Uptime2 Days
Run DateAug 11 '23 at 19:31
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Memory 67.7
1-Core 117
2-Core 206
72% 130 Pts
4-Core 408
8-Core 801
72% 604 Pts
64-Core 1,056
65% 1,056 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Asus(1043 8620) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.3% Outstanding
Lighting 113
Reflection 132
Parallax 117
92% 121 fps
MRender 94
Gravity 122
Splatting 110
89% 109 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122
299GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 461 433 296 306 301 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 481
Write 482
Mixed 444
SusWrite 360
99% 441 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 80.2
4K Mixed 50
164% 55.9 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 354
271% 367 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 109%
Great: 133%
Toshiba External USB 256GB
236GB free
Firmware: 0203
SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 311 89 66 66 65 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.9% Above average
Read 396
Write 362
Mixed 300
SusWrite 148
68% 302 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 37.9
4K Mixed 23.2
87% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 136
116% 171 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 60%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 34 34 34 34 35 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 220
Write 34.7
Mixed 38.8
SusWrite 34.1
60% 81.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.6
137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 101%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78
280GB free
Firmware: MK7OA840
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 39 37 38 37 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 128
Write 36
Mixed 44
SusWrite 37.6
45% 61.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 82%
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB
409GB free
Firmware: 2BA30003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 91 87 93 95 97 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 106
Write 47.5
Mixed 58.2
SusWrite 90.7
56% 75.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.7% Very good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 24.9
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 24.9
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 100 26" 1280 720 AOC2410 AG241QG4
Typical B450 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 7,324 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI B450 Tomahawk - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $695
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback