MSI Z270 TOMAHAWK (MS-7A68)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics57.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive209% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7A68
MotherboardMSI Z270 TOMAHAWK (MS-7A68)  (all builds)
Memory29.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180703
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 21 '23 at 12:33
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 34%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$248
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Memory 92.2
1-Core 130
2-Core 251
89% 158 Pts
4-Core 437
8-Core 651
68% 544 Pts
64-Core 666
41% 666 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Asus(1043 8618) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Lighting 72
Reflection 76.4
Parallax 69.7
59% 72.7 fps
MRender 66.3
Gravity 71.9
Splatting 67.4
56% 68.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX6000 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V9002s94 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 847 1029 1099 1108 387 294 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
209% Outstanding
Read 1,954
Write 1,061
Mixed 866
SusWrite 794
259% 1,169 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 48.2
193% 73.9 MB/s
DQ Read 315
DQ Write 753
DQ Mixed 393
340% 487 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 209%
Great: 244%
Liteon CV8-8E256-11 SATA 256GB
188GB free
Firmware: 10B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 279 271 276 274 275 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 460
Mixed 433
SusWrite 274
93% 414 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 61.9
208% 74 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 129
161% 286 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 117%
Great: 107%
VTP512GSSD1 512GB
477GB free
Firmware: 916a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 421 429 434 431 431 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Read 431
Write 464
Mixed 408
SusWrite 419
97% 430 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 40.4
157% 60.2 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 156
131% 183 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD48G240082 Kingston KHX2400C15/8G Kingston KHX2666C16/8G Kingston KHX2400C15/8G 32GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
84.1% Excellent
MC Read 30.1
MC Write 32.8
MC Mixed 25.9
85% 29.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 37.2
SC Mixed 23.9
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 60 31.5" 1920 1027 SAM0D35 C32F391
Typical Z270 TOMAHAWK (MS-7A68) Builds (Compare 1,755 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht

Motherboard: MSI Z270 TOMAHAWK (MS-7A68) - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $652
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback