Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X670 GAMING X AX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive516% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X670 GAMING X AX  (all builds)
Memory58.1 GB free of 64 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230816
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 21 '23 at 20:33
Run Duration481 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D-$569
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 84
1-Core 160
2-Core 321
101% 188 Pts
4-Core 639
8-Core 1,256
112% 947 Pts
64-Core 3,035
188% 3,035 Pts
Poor: 112%
This bench: 102%
Great: 124%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT2000P3PSSD8 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3828 3840 4048 4172 4171 4170 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
516% Outstanding
Read 2,064
Write 4,129
Mixed 2,573
SusWrite 4,038
730% 3,201 MB/s
4K Read 61.7
4K Write 320
4K Mixed 101
393% 161 MB/s
DQ Read 1,591
DQ Write 1,418
DQ Mixed 1,504
1,128% 1,504 MB/s
Poor: 133%
This bench: 516%
Great: 517%
PNY CS900 4TB SSD
3TB free
Firmware: CS900600
SusWrite @10s intervals: 489 490 489 491 490 491 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 441
Write 496
Mixed 459
SusWrite 490
107% 472 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 57.9
208% 78.9 MB/s
DQ Read 287
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 291
229% 313 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 126%
Great: 126%
Nvme CT4000P 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: P9CR Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2564 2565 2567 2567 2563 2569 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
415% Outstanding
Read 1,988
Write 2609
Mixed 2,214
SusWrite 2566
532% 2,344 MB/s
4K Read 58.8
4K Write 269
4K Mixed 95.5
354% 141 MB/s
DQ Read 1,657
DQ Write 1,528
DQ Mixed 1,608
1,202% 1,597 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 415%
Great: 410%
CT2000P3PSSD8 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: P9CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4166 4176 4168 3960 3963 3962 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
542% Outstanding
Read 2307
Write 4,166
Mixed 2,613
SusWrite 4,066
748% 3,288 MB/s
4K Read 62.2
4K Write 326
4K Mixed 102
398% 163 MB/s
DQ Read 1,843
DQ Write 1,762
DQ Mixed 1,770
1,338% 1,792 MB/s
Poor: 133%
This bench: 542%
Great: 517%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$148
2TB free
Firmware: M3CR045
SusWrite @10s intervals: 451 454 452 453 452 452 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 393
Write 476
Mixed 393
SusWrite 452
97% 428 MB/s
4K Read 45.4
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 65
216% 76.9 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 161
179% 303 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 127%
Great: 124%
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$170
2TB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 496 497 497 497 497 497 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
142% Outstanding
Read 523
Write 500
Mixed 465
SusWrite 497
112% 496 MB/s
4K Read 51
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 70.9
237% 83.7 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 279
236% 343 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 142%
Great: 136%
Nvme CT2000P3 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: P9CR Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4163 4169 4167 3966 3952 3948 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
505% Outstanding
Read 2,049
Write 4,163
Mixed 2,657
SusWrite 4,061
737% 3,232 MB/s
4K Read 58.9
4K Write 259
4K Mixed 94.5
348% 138 MB/s
DQ Read 1,578
DQ Write 1,496
DQ Mixed 1,536
1,154% 1,537 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 505%
Great: 519%
Seagate ST8000VN004-2M2101 8TB
6TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 206 205 208 205 207 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF560C36-32 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
287% Outstanding
MC Read 188
MC Write 68.7
MC Mixed 84.5
325% 114 GB/s
SC Read 51.5
SC Write 61
SC Mixed 55.8
160% 56.1 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 152%
This bench: 287%
Great: 275%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 5 564 469 144 0" 1280 720
Typical GA-X670 GAMING X AX Builds (Compare 83 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 397%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 418%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X670 GAMING X AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $2,074
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $246Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback