Today's hottest deals

Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1505ZA_X1505ZA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive182% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1505ZA_X1505ZA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X1505ZA
Memory7.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230315
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 24 '23 at 17:22
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 94%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1255U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 67.2
1-Core 160
2-Core 252
87% 160 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 707
69% 567 Pts
64-Core 842
52% 842 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Asus(1043 13F3) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.3111
Relative performance (0th percentile)
4.37% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 6.2
Parallax 6.2
4% 5.87 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 4.7
5% 5.77 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 4.37%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNW010T8 1TB
891GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 527 576 571 753 874 841 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
182% Outstanding
Read 1,125
Write 1,012
Mixed 833
SusWrite 690
205% 915 MB/s
4K Read 55.2
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 67.7
240% 85 MB/s
DQ Read 617
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 439
329% 448 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 182%
Great: 258%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44BB0-CWE M471A1K43EB1-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
MC Read 34.8
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 30.4
90% 31.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 33.9
SC Mixed 22.9
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 15.5" 1280 720 SDC4161
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1505ZA_X1505ZA Builds (Compare 94 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1505ZA_X1505ZA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $139
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $72
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback