Today's hottest deals

Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1502ZA_X1502ZA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1502ZA_X1502ZA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X1502ZA
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221223
Uptime7.6 Days
Run DateJun 30 '23 at 18:49
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1240P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 66.7
1-Core 67.7
2-Core 146
54% 93.6 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 427
49% 382 Pts
64-Core 678
42% 678 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Asus(1043 1D52) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Relative performance (0th percentile)
4.88% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 14.9
Parallax 16.1
3% 11.4 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 18.2
Splatting 11.8
9% 11.1 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 4.88%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
368GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 430 476 538 248 317 278 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Read 918
Write 654
Mixed 618
SusWrite 381
143% 643 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 29
4K Mixed 12.4
79% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 322
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 246
187% 254 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 297%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44BB0-CWE M471A1K43EB1-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
47.1% Average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 17
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 7.9
19% 6.73 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1502ZA_X1502ZA Builds (Compare 515 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1502ZA_X1502ZA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $139
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $72
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback