Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics58.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive148% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit kleuren, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20150918
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 30 '23 at 13:53
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
85% Excellent
Memory 97.3
1-Core 120
2-Core 226
85% 148 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 558
60% 476 Pts
64-Core 564
35% 564 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 85%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Asus(1043 8518) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
58.1% Above average
Lighting 71.6
Reflection 83.7
Parallax 74.5
58% 76.6 fps
MRender 76.7
Gravity 71.9
Splatting 65.1
58% 71.2 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$106
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 572 623 633 639 644 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
148% Outstanding
Read 663
Write 624
Mixed 650
SusWrite 580
142% 629 MB/s
4K Read 50.2
4K Write 85.3
4K Mixed 64.1
203% 66.5 MB/s
DQ Read 572
DQ Write 427
DQ Mixed 506
377% 502 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 148%
Great: 477%
Sandisk SD6SA1M032G 32GB
30GB free
Firmware: X211200
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 76 76 77 77 77 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
60.5% Good
Read 366
Write 67.6
Mixed 105
SusWrite 76
33% 154 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 69.4
4K Mixed 31.2
113% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 76.1
DQ Mixed 93.7
82% 127 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 60%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
365GB free
Firmware: AM0B1J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 90 90 91 90 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 81.7
Write 76.9
Mixed 29.1
SusWrite 90
50% 69.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
108% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 60%
Samsung HM641JI 640GB-$50
596GB free
Firmware: 2AJ10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 89 89 88 87 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 67.5
Write 53.1
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 87.1
46% 63 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
90% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 50%
Seagate FreeAgent Go 888GB
769GB free, PID 2101
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 38 39 39 39 40 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Read 59.8
Write 24.6
Mixed 13.7
SusWrite 38
40% 34 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
21% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 16%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB
14GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 2.9 2.4 3.3 3.4 3 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
4.08% Terrible
Read 14.7
Write 0.2
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 3
5% 5.52 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
20% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.08%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ares DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 25.4
82% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 23.9
65% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 49
82% 49 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 31.5" 1536 864 MEIA0C9 Panasonic-TV
Typical GA-Z97X-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 1,727 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 5 - $162

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $810
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback