Compaq(intel LT1504

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCompaq(intel LT1504  (all builds)
MotherboardEii P142K
Memory6.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230711
Uptime23.9 Days
Run DateSep 01 '23 at 22:54
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N5095
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
30.3% Below average
Memory 23.4
1-Core 61.8
2-Core 127
36% 70.6 Pts
4-Core 213
8-Core 217
29% 215 Pts
64-Core 225
14% 225 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
2.53% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 2.9
2% 3.03 fps
MRender 3.6
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 4.4
3% 3.57 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.53%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MG BGM.2 NGFF SSD 512GB
434GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP3105AN
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 328
Write 287
Mixed 250
64% 288 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 24.4
4K Mixed 7.5
45% 15.6 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 13.4
50% 108 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 79%
WDC WDB NCE0010PNC 1TB
703GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 260
Write 267
Mixed 214
55% 247 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 15.2
4K Mixed 12.6
43% 13.4 MB/s
DQ Read 98.7
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 93.5
72% 98.2 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix 53D512M64D4RQ-046 1x12GB
1 of 2 slots used
12GB Row of chips LPDDR4 3733 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.1% Poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 9.1
27% 9.3 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 6.6
19% 6.6 GB/s
Latency 296
14% 296 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 54 40 60 15.6" 1536 864 BOE0747
Typical LT1504 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Compaq(intel LT1504

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback