Shenzhen NJP1561P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemShenzhen NJP1561P  (all builds)
MotherboardShenzhen P142K
Memory7.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230808
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 17 '23 at 15:55
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N5095
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
44.4% Average
Memory 44.9
1-Core 73.2
2-Core 145
48% 87.6 Pts
4-Core 253
8-Core 254
34% 253 Pts
64-Core 251
16% 251 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1660
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.03% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 3
2% 3.2 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 0.2
2% 2.17 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.03%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Biwin CSE80A1A100-512G 512GB
442GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0327A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 316 349 320 266 291 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 402
Write 334
Mixed 336
SusWrite 311
78% 346 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 48.1
4K Mixed 21.3
93% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 50.1
91% 177 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix 53D512M64D4RQ-046 1x12GB
1 of 2 slots used
12GB Row of chips LPDDR4 3733 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (92nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.3% Below average
MC Read 13
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 14.1
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 13.3
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 172
23% 172 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 60 15.6" 1280 720 BOE0747
Typical NJP1561P Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Shenzhen NJP1561P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback