Today's hottest deals

Panasonic FZ55-2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics13.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive87.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
SystemPanasonic FZ55-2  (all builds)
MotherboardPanasonic FZ55-2H
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230309
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateSep 07 '23 at 17:08
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1145G7
IC1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
46.1% Average
Memory 17.1
1-Core 119
2-Core 216
57% 117 Pts
4-Core 403
8-Core 568
61% 485 Pts
64-Core 586
36% 586 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Device(10F7 8353) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Lighting 15.9
Reflection 16
Parallax 19
13% 17 fps
MRender 11.6
Gravity 26
Splatting 13
14% 16.9 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg4aznv512g TOSHIBA MEMORY 512GB
409GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AEPA1102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 461 530 468 402 342 345 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Read 550
Write 321
Mixed 428
SusWrite 425
96% 431 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 39.6
4K Mixed 22.9
88% 29.1 MB/s
DQ Read 445
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 333
232% 299 MB/s
Poor: 87%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 202%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
30.3% Below average
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 9.5
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 4.7
19% 6.73 GB/s
Latency 343
12% 343 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 0 14" 1280 720 IVO057D
Typical FZ55-2 Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Panasonic FZ55-2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback