Dell XPS 8500

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive47.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell XPS 8500  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0YJPT1
Memory2.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120525
Uptime2 Days
Run DateSep 15 '23 at 15:16
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
64.2% Good
Memory 75.7
1-Core 89.2
2-Core 166
64% 110 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 404
43% 345 Pts
64-Core 416
26% 416 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
Nvidia(10DE 093D) 1GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 474.44
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
7.2% Terrible
Lighting 7.9
Reflection 10.3
Parallax 10.5
6% 9.57 fps
MRender 12.3
Gravity 10.5
Splatting 9.5
9% 10.8 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.2%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 212 216 171 80 85 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.1% Average
Read 206
Write 215
Mixed 192
SusWrite 160
44% 193 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 27.5
4K Mixed 23
75% 23.6 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 86.5
DQ Mixed 125
94% 127 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 133%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
137GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 107 103 107 108 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 95.9
Write 97.6
Mixed 40.9
SusWrite 105
62% 84.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 83%
WDC WD20EFRX-68E 2TB
570GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 120 122 123 124 125 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
52% Above average
Read 121
Write 124
Mixed 91.6
SusWrite 122
156% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
119% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 52%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BD186DJ.M8F Samsung M378B5273CH0-CK0 859B CT51264BD186DJ.M8F Samsung M378B5273CH0-CK0 16GB
1333, 1600, 1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.8% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 17
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 15.8
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 88.9
45% 88.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 57 45 60 27" 1280 720 DELA19D DELL S2721DS
Typical XPS 8500 Builds (Compare 2,125 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 8500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $297
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback