Asrock B550M-C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 35% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	57.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Motherboard	Asrock B550M-C (all builds)
Memory	3.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210426
Uptime	12 Days
Run Date	Sep 16 '23 at 20:22
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	66.3% Good	Memory 63.2 1-Core 109 2-Core 205 69% 126 Pts	4-Core 373 8-Core 611 60% 492 Pts	64-Core 759 47% 759 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 66.3% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$250 447,556 User benchmarks, average bench 100% Gigabyte(1458 4074) CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.99 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	57.3% Above average	Lighting 67.2 Reflection 70.7 Parallax 32.1 55% 56.7 fps	MRender 63.9 Gravity 69.8 Splatting 88.3 62% 74 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Black SN850 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100 14,499 User benchmarks, average bench 395% 114GB free Firmware: 614900WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,597 Write 2,450 Mixed 2,332 549% 2,459 MB/s	4K Read 39.4 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 60.4 191% 67.1 MB/s	DQ Read 982 DQ Write 904 DQ Mixed 996 733% 961 MB/s
Poor: 228% Great: 595%
Team T253X6512G 512GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 34GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFMJ1.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 13 24 20 14 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	21% Poor	Read 56 Write 7.3 Mixed 7.2 SusWrite 16.6 16% 21.8 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 3 433% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 21% Great: 36%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown NMUD480E82-3000D 2x8GB 651 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	53.5% Above average	MC Read 22.1 MC Write 14.9 MC Mixed 20.9 55% 19.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 14.7 SC Mixed 16.9 44% 15.4 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 105%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	60	42	60	27.6"	1920 1080	SAM701E LC27T55

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B550M-C Builds (Compare 1,193 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 87%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 82%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock B550M-C

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	249x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $144Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	220x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	216x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $250Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	317x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	124x
RX 6700-XTAMD $480Bench 122%, 20,231 samples	121x

SSD
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBWD $74Bench 228%, 180,890 samples	202x
Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBWDBench 242%, 51,051 samples	103x
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	75x

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	195x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	176x
D4U0832220B 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 383 samples	59x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 101% - Outstanding

Total price: $407

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16