Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5420 349 User benchmarks, average bench 44% LGA771/CPU1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	36.7% Below average	Memory 50.7 1-Core 35.2 2-Core 68.1 33% 51.3 Pts	4-Core 124 8-Core 198 20% 161 Pts	64-Core 231 14% 231 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 47%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Team T253X6512G 512GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 434GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 50 50 50 54 52 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	36.4% Below average	Read 72.5 Write 54.3 Mixed 39.2 SusWrite 50.9 40% 54.2 MB/s	4K Read 5.3 4K Write 6 4K Mixed 4.7 854% 5.33 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 36%
Hitachi HMS5C4040BLE640 4TB 902 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 3.5TB free Firmware: MPAOA5D0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 50 50 51 53 53 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	37.5% Below average	Read 79.5 Write 52.6 Mixed 53.8 SusWrite 51 44% 59.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.5 107% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 73%
Hitachi HMS5C4040ALE640 4TB 1,439 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 3.5TB free Firmware: MPAOA580 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 85 86 87 93 91 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	45.8% Average	Read 71.8 Write 61.8 Mixed 47.3 SusWrite 87.6 49% 67.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.4 102% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x2GB 38,297 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 6 of 8 slots used 12GB DIMM DDR2 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	13.5% Very poor	MC Read 4.9 MC Write 4 MC Mixed 5.1 13% 4.67 GB/s	SC Read 1.9 SC Write 1.9 SC Mixed 2.8 6% 2.2 GB/s	Latency 156 26% 156 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 59%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	11	9	64	0"	1280 720

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16