Asus M51AC

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.17% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	73.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus M51AC (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK M51AC
Memory	2.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130510
Uptime	4.8 Days
Run Date	Sep 22 '23 at 01:29
Run Duration	116 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	57%

PC Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$65 176,321 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	63.7% Good	Memory 82 1-Core 79.3 2-Core 141 61% 101 Pts	4-Core 247 8-Core 368 38% 307 Pts	64-Core 460 28% 460 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640 34,519 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 8597) ≥ 4GB CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	5.17% Terrible	Lighting 5.9 Reflection 6.9 Parallax 7.4 5% 6.73 fps	MRender 7 Gravity 8 Splatting 6.7 6% 7.23 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.17% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 311GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 160 162 150 166 169 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	73.7% Very good	Read 361 Write 340 Mixed 303 SusWrite 181 66% 296 MB/s	4K Read 26.4 4K Write 51.7 4K Mixed 33.6 110% 37.2 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 244 DQ Mixed 314 233% 311 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/8G 0420 MI64C1D1629Z1 24GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	44.1% Average	MC Read 15.8 MC Write 15.9 MC Mixed 13.5 43% 15.1 GB/s	SC Read 11.1 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 13.9 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 77.8 51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	69	56	70	0"	1280 720	W2243

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M51AC Builds (Compare 633 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

System: Asus M51AC

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $65Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	390x
Core i7-4770SIntel $112Bench 71%, 13,157 samples	125x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	33x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	43x
GeForce GT 640NvidiaBench 6%, 34,519 samples	41x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	36x

SSD
MX500 1TBCrucial $88Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	15x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	15x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	14x

RAM
MI64C1D1629Z1 2x8GBAdataBench 54%, 2,816 samples	79x
MI64C1D1629Z1 1x8GBAdataBench 31%, 1,606 samples	36x
AO2L16BC8R2-BR2S 2x8GBUnknownBench 56%, 671 samples	36x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 83% - Excellent

Total price: $212

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16