Asus Z97-DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics75.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive94.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
9 months ago, 8 months ago.
MotherboardAsus Z97-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory19.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140617
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 22 '23 at 11:08
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 80
1-Core 110
2-Core 207
75% 132 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 529
56% 449 Pts
64-Core 548
34% 548 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.2% Very good
Lighting 93
Reflection 111
Parallax 97.4
76% 101 fps
MRender 94.5
Gravity 93.6
Splatting 85.5
74% 91.2 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 222 244 248 254 263 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Read 466
Write 388
Mixed 341
SusWrite 242
80% 359 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 66.9
4K Mixed 44.3
147% 49.1 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 226
204% 310 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 118%
Lexar NM610PRO 500GB
99GB free
Firmware: 9139
SusWrite @10s intervals: 438 562 581 635 568 516 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 663
Write 618
Mixed 627
SusWrite 550
138% 614 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 73.3
4K Mixed 53.8
175% 57.1 MB/s
DQ Read 606
DQ Write 408
DQ Mixed 491
371% 502 MB/s
Poor: 141%
This bench: 137%
Great: 305%
OCZ ARC 100 240GB-$120
132GB free
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 333 300 357 364 345 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 369
Write 413
Mixed 293
SusWrite 321
79% 349 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 74.7
4K Mixed 32.2
116% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 315
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 257
213% 305 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMD16GX3M2A1866C10 1201 AP38G1608U2K 0215 CMD16GX3M2A1866C10 1201 AP38G1608U2K 24GB
1867, 1600, 1867, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.6% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 14.3
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 15.1
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 82.5
48% 82.5 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 27.2" 2560 1377 GSM5B09 LG Ultra HD
Typical Z97-DELUXE Builds (Compare 624 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-DELUXE - $650

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $1,335
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback