Asus Z97-DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive95.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 months ago, 6 months ago.
MotherboardAsus Z97-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory18.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140617
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 22 '23 at 21:46
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 110
2-Core 198
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 371
8-Core 540
57% 455 Pts
64-Core 552
34% 552 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$293
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 545.84
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
120% Outstanding
Lighting 161
Reflection 111
Parallax 141
131% 138 fps
MRender 200
Gravity 126
Splatting 102
112% 143 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 120%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$72
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 213 234 230 222 224 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Read 464
Write 443
Mixed 353
SusWrite 238
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 70
4K Mixed 43.6
148% 50 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 230
208% 316 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 118%
Lexar NM610PRO 500GB
97GB free
Firmware: 9139
SusWrite @10s intervals: 610 589 595 623 588 517 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 664
Write 607
Mixed 626
SusWrite 587
140% 621 MB/s
4K Read 46
4K Write 70.4
4K Mixed 54.6
177% 57 MB/s
DQ Read 615
DQ Write 431
DQ Mixed 519
389% 522 MB/s
Poor: 141%
This bench: 141%
Great: 305%
OCZ ARC 100 240GB-$120
132GB free
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 348 307 357 333 377 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 373
Write 418
Mixed 309
SusWrite 340
81% 360 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 73.8
4K Mixed 32.8
117% 43.4 MB/s
DQ Read 318
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 257
213% 304 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMD16GX3M2A1866C10 1201 AP38G1608U2K 0215 CMD16GX3M2A1866C10 1201 AP38G1608U2K 24GB
1867, 1600, 1867, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.5% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 14.8
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 15.9
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 1: 0P 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
1% 3% 29 206 41 60 27.2" 2560 1377 GSM5B09 LG Ultra HD
Typical Z97-DELUXE Builds (Compare 621 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus Z97-DELUXE - $650

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $1,634
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback