Today's hottest deals

Apple MacPro7,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics97.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory768GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 768GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemApple MacPro7,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-27AD2F918AE68F61
Memory706.1 GB free of 768 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, , , 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221130
Uptime9.4 Days
Run DateOct 03 '23 at 03:08
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-3275M
CPU0, 1 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 69.3
1-Core 97.3
2-Core 195
67% 120 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 781
69% 585 Pts
64-Core 3,551
220% 3,551 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 71%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
Apple(106B 0203) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 32GB, Driver: 23.4.2
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.7% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 113
Parallax 216
103% 152 fps
MRender 99.1
Gravity 151
Splatting 79.2
87% 110 fps
Poor: 98%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 105%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple APPLE SSD AP4096 4TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 129
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1371 1297 1283 1352 1479 1458 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 8% Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA8GR7AJR4N-WM 12x31.9GB
12 of 12 slots used
383GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
162% Outstanding
MC Read 58.7
MC Write 80.7
MC Mixed 65
195% 68.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 8
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 98.6
41% 98.6 ns
Poor: 107%
This bench: 162%
Great: 162%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 0 31.5" 1280 720 GBT3204 Gigabyte M32U
Typical MacPro7,1 Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat

System: Apple MacPro7,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback