Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	30.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium N4200 10,928 User benchmarks, average bench 30% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	26.5% Poor	Memory 38.2 1-Core 39 2-Core 56.6 28% 44.6 Pts	4-Core 83.5 8-Core 102 12% 92.9 Pts	64-Core 113 7% 113 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 7,629 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4749 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 1.17 Reflection 1.12 Parallax 1.38 1% 1.22 fps	Gravity 2.17 Splatting 4.39 3% 3.28 fps
Poor: 1% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba 128G3A 125GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0.0 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	30.3% Below average	Read 296 Write 73.2 Mixed 129 36% 166 MB/s	4K Read 18.8 4K Write 16.1 4K Mixed 6.68 46% 13.9 MB/s	DQ Read 19.4 DQ Write 21.3 DQ Mixed 3.65 7% 14.8 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 39%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 124GB 7,722 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 111GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	31.5% Below average	Read 133 Write 34.8 Mixed 48.7 74% 72.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.46 4K Write 1.24 4K Mixed 0.55 74% 1.75 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 37%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 2x2GB 5,404 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	18.1% Very poor	MC Read 6.6 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 6.7 19% 6.73 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 3.2 9% 3.1 GB/s	Latency 211 19% 211 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 27%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16