Samsung 340XAA/350XAA/550XAA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 340XAA/350XAA/550XAA  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP350XAA-KF4BR
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 06 '23 at 03:00
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7020U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
49.7% Average
Memory 72.2
1-Core 61.8
2-Core 114
51% 82.7 Pts
4-Core 161
8-Core 159
21% 160 Pts
64-Core 166
10% 166 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Sanyo(144D C804) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.7988
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.63% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 3.1
Parallax 5.8
4% 4.7 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 8.6
5% 6.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.63%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NN TECNOL GIA 512GB
448GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1011B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 280 315 319 309 324 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
63.8% Good
Read 371
Write 326
Mixed 332
SusWrite 312
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 47
4K Mixed 15.7
72% 26.8 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 51
77% 144 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SF4641G8CKHIWDFSDS 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.3% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 9.9
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 10.7
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 96.6
41% 96.6 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 50 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO38ED
Typical 340XAA/350XAA/550XAA Builds (Compare 676 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 340XAA/350XAA/550XAA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback