Gigabyte GA-G5 KC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive218% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-G5 KC  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210120
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 26 '23 at 07:26
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
85% Excellent
Memory 84.2
1-Core 124
2-Core 246
84% 151 Pts
4-Core 461
8-Core 744
74% 602 Pts
64-Core 933
58% 933 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 85%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 50F3) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9365
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
4.56% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 8.7
Parallax 7.3
5% 7.37 fps
MRender 9.8
Gravity 6
Splatting 0.1
4% 5.3 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.56%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SX8200PNP-512GT- 512GB
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SANA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 491 347 305 306 287 259 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
218% Outstanding
Read 2,456
Write 1,753
Mixed 271
SusWrite 332
264% 1,203 MB/s
4K Read 51.4
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 68
226% 78 MB/s
DQ Read 736
DQ Write 571
DQ Mixed 483
408% 597 MB/s
Poor: 158%
This bench: 218%
Great: 290%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
9GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 502
Write 479
Mixed 427
105% 469 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 82.8
4K Mixed 47.3
156% 54.8 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 354
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 128%
Nvme PNY CS2140 1TB S
323GB free
Firmware: 4901 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 461 504 516 518 512 514 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 340
Write 511
Mixed 108
SusWrite 504
83% 366 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 79.5
4K Mixed 10.4
63% 31.7 MB/s
DQ Read 433
DQ Write 404
DQ Mixed 75.3
151% 304 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 246%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.9% Very good
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 21.9
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 31.9
SC Mixed 22.6
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 144 15.5" 1536 801 AUOAF90
Typical GA-G5 KC Builds (Compare 1,647 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-G5 KC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback