Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230605
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 28 '23 at 16:09
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel N95
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
50.5% Above average
Memory 46.1
1-Core 103
2-Core 169
58% 106 Pts
4-Core 322
8-Core 290
42% 306 Pts
64-Core 320
20% 320 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 7270) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4146
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
2.69% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 6
Parallax 3.9
3% 4.47 fps
MRender 0.6
Gravity 4.7
Splatting 3.1
2% 2.8 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.69%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kimtigo 256GB 256GB
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN14752
SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 409 391 394 423 417 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Read 416
Write 455
Mixed 429
SusWrite 399
96% 424 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 82.1
4K Mixed 41.6
151% 53.1 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 271
DQ Mixed 266
195% 252 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 244%
Ct1000p5
81GB free
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 375 369 365 389 390 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 136
Write 304
Mixed 177
SusWrite 372
56% 247 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Write 33.7
4K Mixed 27.5
64% 22.9 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 81.5
DQ Mixed 154
101% 120 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 4x2GB
4 of 8 slots used
8GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
52.5% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 20
56% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 15.2
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 172
23% 172 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 37 6 60 23.8" 1280 720 DELD0DA DELL P2419H
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,783 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback