Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive26.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230606
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateOct 31 '23 at 09:34
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 80%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2650L v4
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.3% Very poor
Memory 14.2
1-Core 22.6
2-Core 46.2
15% 27.7 Pts
4-Core 130
8-Core 267
23% 198 Pts
64-Core 236
15% 236 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 45%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 268GB
232GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 20 22 21 22 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Read 420
Write 86.2
Mixed 240
SusWrite 21.3
42% 192 MB/s
4K Read 8.6
4K Write 6.5
4K Mixed 8.7
28% 7.93 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 108%
Qemu HARDDISK 161GB
146GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 103 106 98 98 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 438
Write 234
Mixed 388
SusWrite 102
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 11
4K Write 8.8
4K Mixed 10
34% 9.93 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 190
142% 190 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 84%
Qemu HARDDISK 54GB
50GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 102 104 97 104 106 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 15% Great: 90%
Qemu HARDDISK 27GB
25GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 107 101 91 102 110 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 19% Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB DIMM RAM
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
46.1% Average
MC Read 20
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 22.6
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 5
12% 4.27 GB/s
Latency 331
12% 331 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 161%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 5 64 0" 1280 720
Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 621 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $155
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback