Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZV4_FX507ZV4

Performance Results


Gaming 110% UFO	Desktop 110% UFO	Workstation 107% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	488% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 months ago, 6 months ago.

System	Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZV4_FX507ZV4 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX507ZV4
Memory	8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20230719
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 09 '23 at 12:59
Run Duration	214 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-12700H 52,857 User benchmarks, average bench 97% U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Memory 82.1 1-Core 189 2-Core 362 111% 211 Pts	4-Core 677 8-Core 1,077 108% 877 Pts	64-Core 1,471 91% 1,471 Pts
Poor: 91% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 102%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060 (Laptop) 18,525 User benchmarks, average bench 113% Asus(1043 277D) ≥ 4GB CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.01 Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	101% Outstanding	Lighting 120 Reflection 179 Parallax 110 98% 136 fps	MRender 204 Gravity 119 Splatting 95.3 109% 139 fps
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 129%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-512G-1002 512GB 459 User benchmarks, average bench 343% 403GB free (System drive) Firmware: 73101000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 3047 3383 3437 3096 662 614 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	488% Outstanding	Read 3,868 Write 3,497 Mixed 2,485 SusWrite 2,373 685% 3,056 MB/s	4K Read 83.6 4K Write 269 4K Mixed 106 405% 153 MB/s	DQ Read 1,701 DQ Write 1,232 DQ Mixed 1,449 1,087% 1,460 MB/s
Poor: 211% ↑ This bench: 488% Great: 488%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB 13,169 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 10GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 34.7 Write 7.2 Mixed 4.2 14% 15.4 MB/s	4K Read 5.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 20% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GB 38,732 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	MC Read 43.3 MC Write 33.8 MC Mixed 36.8 108% 38 GB/s	SC Read 19.1 SC Write 41.3 SC Mixed 27 83% 29.1 GB/s	Latency 72.8 55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 105%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	37	12	144	15.5"	1280 720	BOE0B70 NE156FHM-NX6

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZV4_FX507ZV4 Builds (Compare 472 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 112%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 117%

UFO

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZV4_FX507ZV4

CPU
Core i7-12700HIntelBench 97%, 52,857 samples	472x

GPU
RTX 4060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 113%, 18,525 samples	266x
Iris Xe GraphicsIntelBench 16%, 72,765 samples	184x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 15%, 7,232 samples	22x

SSD
Micron_2400_MTFDKBA512QFM 512GBNvmeBench 172%, 2,910 samples	213x
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-512G-1002 512GBNvmeBench 343%, 459 samples	61x
Micron_2400_MTFDKBA1T0QFM 1TBNvmeBench 258%, 5,218 samples	32x

RAM
HMAG68EXNSA051N 2x8GBHynixBench 95%, 1,652 samples	166x
M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 38,732 samples	145x
M471A2K43EB1-CWE 1x16GBSamsungBench 46%, 7,758 samples	42x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16