Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HF_FX506HF

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	211% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HF_FX506HF (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX506HF
Memory	1.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20230720
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Jan 04 '24 at 03:02
Run Duration	116 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-11400H 35,470 User benchmarks, average bench 80% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	60% Good	Memory 44 1-Core 128 2-Core 237 70% 136 Pts	4-Core 408 8-Core 594 63% 501 Pts	64-Core 861 53% 861 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 3088) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4502 Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	4.36% Terrible	Lighting 4.5 Reflection 9.6 Parallax 5.4 4% 6.5 fps	MRender 8.2 Gravity 6 Splatting 6.8 6% 7 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.36% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-512G-1002 512GB 459 User benchmarks, average bench 343% 181GB free (System drive) Firmware: 73101000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1317 927 364 277 275 236 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	211% Outstanding	Read 1,998 Write 1,102 Mixed 1,314 SusWrite 566 276% 1,245 MB/s	4K Read 57.9 4K Write 123 4K Mixed 56.4 225% 79 MB/s	DQ Read 916 DQ Write 357 DQ Mixed 707 504% 660 MB/s
Poor: 211% ↑ This bench: 211% Great: 488%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 1x8GB 14,450 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	35.6% Below average	MC Read 14.8 MC Write 13.2 MC Mixed 11.7 38% 13.2 GB/s	SC Read 6.8 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 8.2 22% 7.83 GB/s	Latency 145 28% 145 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	2	187	29	144	15.5"	1280 720	NCP004D

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HF_FX506HF Builds (Compare 823 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HF_FX506HF

CPU
Core i5-11400HIntelBench 80%, 35,470 samples	787x
Gen Intel Core i5-11260H11thBench 72%, 2,929 samples	31x
Core i7-11800HIntelBench 88%, 56,029 samples	5x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 4%, 25,082 samples	550x
GeForce RTX 2050NvidiaBench 52%, 900 samples	269x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 7%, 53,008 samples	4x

SSD
SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GBNvmeBench 183%, 7,990 samples	486x
INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GBNvmeBench 197%, 18,245 samples	104x
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-512G-1002 512GBNvmeBench 343%, 459 samples	83x

RAM
M471A1K43EB1-CWE 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 14,450 samples	206x
HMAG68EXNSA051N 1x8GBHynixBench 43%, 638 samples	148x
HMAG68EXNSA051N 2x8GBHynixBench 95%, 1,652 samples	98x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16