Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 137%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 126%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive47.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230201
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 19 '23 at 06:40
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11600KF-$156
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 94.6
1-Core 168
2-Core 326
106% 196 Pts
4-Core 612
8-Core 952
97% 782 Pts
64-Core 1197
74% 1197 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 104%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Asus(1043 8827) ≥ 4GB; Geforce RTX 3060 ti
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
132% Outstanding
Lighting 185
Reflection 176
Parallax 167
150% 176 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 137
Splatting 118
118% 148 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 132%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 512GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VC2S0383 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 89 83 66 54 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 358
Write 77.8
Mixed 136
SusWrite 71.6
35% 161 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 82.6
4K Mixed 6.1
59% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 430
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 173
152% 236 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 291%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
124GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 109 111 112 113 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 106
Write 90.1
Mixed 48.3
SusWrite 112
65% 88.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$130
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 138 140 140 140 143 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 81.4
Write 101
Mixed 73.6
SusWrite 140
73% 99 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
63% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$44
89GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 85 85 91 93 88 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 79.7
Write 136
Mixed 68.8
SusWrite 88
69% 93.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
63% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH16GX4M2D3600C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
124% Outstanding
MC Read 46.4
MC Write 47.1
MC Mixed 42.8
130% 45.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.8
SC Write 47.1
SC Mixed 35.2
98% 34.4 GB/s
Latency 56.2
71% 56.2 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 124%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 27" 1280 720 DEL40EB DELL U2717D
Typical TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS Builds (Compare 3,048 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $454
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback