Today's hottest deals

Micro Neptune series(i9)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics9.03% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive124% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro Neptune series(i9)  (all builds)
MotherboardShenzhen AHBAA
Memory52.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 13:34
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
40.7% Average
Memory 49.2
1-Core 33.1
2-Core 63.5
31% 48.6 Pts
4-Core 173
8-Core 374
32% 274 Pts
64-Core 632
39% 632 Pts
Poor: 95%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4575
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
9.03% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 10.3
Parallax 25.4
5% 13.9 fps
MRender 19.7
Gravity 25.6
Splatting 18.6
17% 21.3 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.03%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 2TB
810GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.F.J.CC Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1021 436 578 572 936 877 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 877
Write 1,638
Mixed 1,267
SusWrite 737
257% 1,130 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 48.7
4K Mixed 34.8
123% 39.4 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 136
104% 141 MB/s
Poor: 156%
This bench: 124%
Great: 578%
Sandisk S31024G 1TB
650GB free
Firmware: X6107000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 125 94 112 230 243 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 306
Write 284
Mixed 241
SusWrite 180
57% 253 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 19.9
4K Mixed 10.9
46% 14.9 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 126
92% 120 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 121%
Kingston OM8PGP41024 1TB
615GB free
Firmware: 8206
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 195 199 202 334 331 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.4% Above average
Read 487
Write 527
Mixed 471
SusWrite 272
99% 440 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 16.3
4K Mixed 14.8
52% 15.8 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 169
DQ Mixed 159
120% 161 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT32G4SFD832A.M16FF 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
68.6% Good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 29.3
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 7.6
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 136
29% 136 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 35 12 60 21.5" 1280 720 DELA115 DELL P2219H
Typical Neptune series(i9) Builds (Compare 84 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Micro Neptune series(i9)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback