Today's hottest deals

AZW GT-R

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.23% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAZW GT-R  (all builds)
MotherboardAZW GT-R
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210719
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 19 '24 at 19:37
Run Duration252 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Memory 59.5
1-Core 112
2-Core 189
67% 120 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 466
47% 381 Pts
64-Core 467
29% 467 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
AMD(1002 0123) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
9.23% Terrible
Lighting 11.4
Reflection 10.2
Parallax 14.7
9% 12.1 fps
MRender 8.3
Gravity 14.9
Splatting 10.3
9% 11.2 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.23%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 256GB 256GB
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0928A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 703 517 77 78 93 89 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 1,513
Write 781
Mixed 770
SusWrite 259
183% 831 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 45.2
4K Mixed 17.9
93% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 340
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 125
125% 207 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 115%
Great: 166%
Kingston OM8PGP41024 1TB
900GB free
Firmware: 0209
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 254 263 250 270 267 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.6% Above average
Read 285
Write 275
Mixed 275
SusWrite 258
62% 273 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 19.6
4K Mixed 19.7
70% 20.6 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 133
106% 148 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 59%
Fujitsu MJA2500BH G2 500GB
140GB free
Firmware: 00400018
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 52 52 56 50 55 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
31.6% Below average
Read 57
Write 51.7
Mixed 34.6
SusWrite 53
36% 49.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
111% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 47%
Seagate Expansion Desk 10TB
995GB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 56 56 57 56 56 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 20% Great: 107%
WD My Book 1230 6TB
1.5TB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 112 113 111 114 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 154
Write 153
Mixed 81.8
SusWrite 113
165% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
132% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 68%
ST16000N M001G-2KK103 16TB
3TB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 136 139 134 141 140 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Read 223
Write 210
Mixed 133
SusWrite 137
229% 175 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 8.8
4K Mixed 1.3
403% 8.7 MB/s
DQ Read 5.1
DQ Write 12
DQ Mixed 1.5
478% 6.2 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 129%
WD Elements 2TB
121GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 33 33 30 33 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Read 54
Write 29.8
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 32.5
44% 35.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
53% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 4ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 CT8G4SFS824A.C8FP 16GB
2667, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.8% Average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 16.2
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 16.2
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 27" 1280 720 DEL40BD DELL P2715Q
Typical GT-R Builds (Compare 77 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: AZW GT-R

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback