Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive282% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA  (all builds)
Memory51.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191206
Uptime5.2 Days
Run DateSep 04 '20 at 01:05
Run Duration254 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Memory 77
1-Core 132
2-Core 263
85% 157 Pts
4-Core 520
8-Core 976
89% 748 Pts
64-Core 1,947
120% 1,947 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
EVGA(3842 2982) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.48
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 53% Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SX8200PNP 2TB
518GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42AZS6AC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1608 734 168 1243 1080 1067 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
282% Outstanding
Read 2,577
Write 1,496
Mixed 248
SusWrite 983
292% 1,326 MB/s
4K Read 61.1
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 64.7
252% 90.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,120
DQ Write 767
DQ Mixed 525
505% 804 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 282%
Great: 370%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
226GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 435 436 451 448 301 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 427
Mixed 443
SusWrite 411
100% 445 MB/s
4K Read 40.1
4K Write 80.1
4K Mixed 51.9
170% 57.4 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 171
DQ Mixed 199
148% 196 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 107%
Great: 129%
WD Black 6TB (2016)-$222
63GB free
Firmware: 81.H0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 165 162 165 164 157 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Read 160
Write 138
Mixed 82
SusWrite 162
99% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 0.7
230% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 121%
Seagate IronWolf 10TB (2016)-$219
632GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 133 132 133 136 136 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
73.5% Very good
Read 120
Write 116
Mixed 71
SusWrite 134
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 7.6
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
487% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 113%
ST16000N M001G-2KK103 16TB
13.5TB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 227 230 236 236 236 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 245
Write 231
Mixed 136
SusWrite 230
281% 210 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 12.7
4K Mixed 1.4
551% 11.1 MB/s
DQ Read 3.8
DQ Write 7.6
DQ Mixed 1.4
320% 4.27 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 129%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3600C18-32GTZR 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3466 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 43.9
MC Write 39.5
MC Mixed 40.4
118% 41.3 GB/s
SC Read 24.4
SC Write 25.3
SC Mixed 36.2
82% 28.6 GB/s
Latency 86.3
46% 86.3 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 110%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA Builds (Compare 3,019 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $895
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback