Lenovo 82MF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics15.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive250% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 82MF  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory7.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 22 '23 at 21:50
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Memory 69.1
1-Core 137
2-Core 275
85% 160 Pts
4-Core 527
8-Core 772
81% 649 Pts
64-Core 1,030
64% 1,030 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 3F95) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Lighting 19.7
Reflection 18.1
Parallax 28
16% 21.9 fps
MRender 13.7
Gravity 20.6
Splatting 21.3
16% 18.5 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssstc CL4-4D512-Q62 512GB
350GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1U262
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1501 1448 1561 1003 493 494 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
250% Outstanding
Read 2,272
Write 1771
Mixed 1,508
SusWrite 1,083
371% 1,659 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 38
183% 69.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,064
DQ Write 679
DQ Mixed 740
587% 828 MB/s
Poor: 92%
This bench: 250%
Great: 250%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AL1P32NC8T1-B8DS HT Micron HTH5AN8G6NDJR-XND 12GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
66.3% Good
MC Read 24.3
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 23.5
64% 22.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 34.9
SC Mixed 23.5
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 15.5" 1828 1057 LEN9051
Typical 82MF Builds (Compare 242 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82MF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback