Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 169%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 126%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics98.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive297% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 4 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 22 '23 at 23:29
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900K-$400
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Memory 79.3
1-Core 231
2-Core 464
131% 258 Pts
4-Core 926
8-Core 1,754
160% 1,340 Pts
64-Core 4,269
264% 4,269 Pts
Poor: 123%
This bench: 126%
Great: 135%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$280
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.9% Outstanding
Lighting 129
Reflection 118
Parallax 131
105% 126 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 101
Splatting 88.3
87% 109 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$75
255GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1860 334 243 234 217 218 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
297% Outstanding
Read 1,830
Write 2,236
Mixed 1,934
SusWrite 518
367% 1,629 MB/s
4K Read 68.1
4K Write 226
4K Mixed 102
353% 132 MB/s
DQ Read 1,951
DQ Write 1,803
DQ Mixed 1,661
1,305% 1,805 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 297%
Great: 365%
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
8GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 34 94 42 17 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
40% Below average
Read 296
Write 101
Mixed 121
SusWrite 69.8
32% 147 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 37.9
4K Mixed 17.2
74% 25.3 MB/s
DQ Read 34
DQ Write 36.4
DQ Mixed 32
25% 34.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 40%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF560C40-16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
142% Outstanding
MC Read 56.7
MC Write 52.7
MC Mixed 52.4
154% 53.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 52.2
SC Mixed 29.5
98% 34.3 GB/s
Latency 80
50% 80 ns
Poor: 142%
This bench: 142%
Great: 204%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 165 23.8" 1920 1017 SAM71DA LS24AG32x
Typical TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS Builds (Compare 871 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 265%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 295%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $1,065
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback