Asrock H370 Performance

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 137%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 124%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics141% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive58.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock H370 Performance  (all builds)
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191203
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 25 '23 at 01:36
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$253
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Memory 90.6
1-Core 142
2-Core 282
94% 172 Pts
4-Core 563
8-Core 942
92% 752 Pts
64-Core 938
58% 938 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 105%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$497
EVGA(3842 3755) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
141% Outstanding
Lighting 206
Reflection 189
Parallax 184
168% 193 fps
MRender 182
Gravity 138
Splatting 123
118% 148 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 141%
Great: 158%
Intel UHD Graphics 630
ASRock(1849 3E98) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9415
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
6.11% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 10.2
Parallax 9
5% 8.4 fps
MRender 10.6
Gravity 7.8
Splatting 12
8% 10.1 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.11%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 240GB-$78
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS131132
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 217 169 155 225 127 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 204
Write 289
Mixed 330
SusWrite 175
57% 250 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 27.1
4K Mixed 32.6
93% 27.9 MB/s
DQ Read 283
DQ Write 157
DQ Mixed 104
109% 181 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 97%
PNY CS1030 500GB SSD
49GB free
Firmware: CS103700
SusWrite @10s intervals: 522 93 99 98 107 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 959
Write 811
Mixed 765
SusWrite 169
151% 676 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 94.1
4K Mixed 48.8
162% 58.7 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 651
DQ Mixed 455
362% 495 MB/s
Poor: 101%
This bench: 122%
Great: 243%
T-force T253TY002T 2TB
336GB free
Firmware: V0718B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 52 52 51 53 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 478
Write 348
Mixed 366
SusWrite 86.3
71% 320 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 62.7
4K Mixed 20.4
93% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 123
DQ Write 297
DQ Mixed 31
75% 150 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 115%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
841GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 118 116 116 117 118 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 91.1
Write 98.2
Mixed 58.9
SusWrite 117
67% 91.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
203GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 142 145 137 145 136 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Read 109
Write 132
Mixed 75.8
SusWrite 140
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
106% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFRA266.M16FG 859B CT8G4DFRA266.C8FN 859B CT8G4DFRA266.C8FN 859B CT8G4DFRA266.C8FN 32GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
MC Read 30.3
MC Write 33.7
MC Mixed 26.6
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 35.9
SC Mixed 25.7
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 165 27" 1920 1080 AUS2720 VG278
Typical H370 Performance Builds (Compare 348 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asrock H370 Performance

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $566
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback