Today's hottest deals

Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics96.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive58% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190731
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 25 '23 at 13:29
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Memory 85
1-Core 112
2-Core 222
79% 140 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 653
65% 532 Pts
64-Core 777
48% 777 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$220
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96.7% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 144
Parallax 114
102% 128 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 99.8
Splatting 87.6
85% 107 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 106%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 512GB SSD 512GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 77 216 230 74 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
58% Above average
Read 413
Write 210
Mixed 313
SusWrite 125
59% 266 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 67.3
4K Mixed 14.5
98% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 79.8
DQ Mixed 29.2
47% 93.9 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 58%
Great: 313%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 TL48G32S8RRGB16 16GB
3334, 3334 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 45.1
MC Write 40.2
MC Mixed 33.9
114% 39.7 GB/s
SC Read 27.5
SC Write 36.9
SC Mixed 30.2
90% 31.5 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 109%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 30: 0P 1R 4G 13B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
30% 46% 39 216 60 165 27" 1280 720 SPT0A05 Sceptre M25
Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,250 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $355
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback