Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive175% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231005
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 27 '23 at 14:42
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel N100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 0.8 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
36.8% Below average
Memory 42.5
1-Core 68
2-Core 122
44% 77.6 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 210
25% 192 Pts
64-Core 220
14% 220 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 7270) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4575
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
3.27% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 5.9
Parallax 4.1
3% 4.5 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 4.9
4% 5.03 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.27%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Biwin CE480V6D10H-1TB 1TB
899GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.4.6.47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 960 1045 1044 1053 1096 1100 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
175% Outstanding
Read 935
Write 1093
Mixed 985
SusWrite 1,050
230% 1,015 MB/s
4K Read 47.4
4K Write 83.9
4K Mixed 46.7
176% 59.3 MB/s
DQ Read 528
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 238
234% 376 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 175%
Great: 370%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KINSOTIN16GB2666MHZ 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
36.6% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 13.6
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 4.7
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 6.5
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 162
25% 162 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 20 2 30 27.5" 1280 720 SAM0C4E U28E590
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,838 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback