Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H61-MX USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-MX USB3  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120629
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 10 '23 at 10:13
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 88.8
1-Core 92.1
2-Core 179
71% 120 Pts
4-Core 275
8-Core 312
38% 293 Pts
64-Core 298
18% 298 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 420
Device(0000 0000) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 267 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
1.69% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 3.2
Parallax 0.5
2% 1.9 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 1.9
2% 2.27 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.69%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 240GB SSD 240GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 142 130 141 143 143 MB/s
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.5% Average
Read 228
Write 210
Mixed 189
SusWrite 145
43% 193 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 49.4
4K Mixed 19.2
91% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 31.3
DQ Write 71.2
DQ Mixed 27.2
28% 43.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 96%
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$49
64GB free
Firmware: 4.AAB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 58 57 58 58 58 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 107
Write 24.3
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 57.7
43% 58.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 42%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
836GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 194 191 189 192 194 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 130
Mixed 69.9
SusWrite 190
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 108%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Ramsta-1600Mhz-8G 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
59.9% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 18.9
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 17.5
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 60 21.5" 1280 720 SAM0C17 S22E390
Typical P8H61-MX USB3 Builds (Compare 548 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-MX USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback