| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor. |
| Graphics | 25.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Biostar H110MHV3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160121 |
| Uptime | 1.8 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 18 '23 at 06:25 |
| Run Duration | 213 Seconds |
| Run User | PHL-User |
| Background CPU | 100% |
PC Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
27.2%
Poor
|
29% 45.6 Pts
|
10% 67.7 Pts
|
3% 44.4 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.9%
Poor
|
27% 34.9 fps
|
24% 30.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$53
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 178 181 193 216 213 MB/s
|
53% 229 MB/s
|
157% 176 MB/s
|
39% 18 MB/s
| |
|
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30
864GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 88 104 93 92 94 MB/s
|
70% 96.7 MB/s
|
100% 1.8 MB/s
| ||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown Ramsta-1600Mhz-8G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
28.7%
Poor
|
32% 11.1 GB/s
|
13% 4.53 GB/s
|
22% 183 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 0% | 0 | 33 | 13 | 60 | 23.5" | 1280 720 | VSC983D VA2409-FHD |
Typical H110MHV3 Builds (Compare 178 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Biostar H110MHV3
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3-6100Intel $44Bench 55%, 110,166 samples | 27x |
| Core i3-7100Intel $35Bench 57%, 79,299 samples | 26x |
| Pentium G4560Intel $31Bench 57%, 70,054 samples | 19x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 19x |
| HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 14x |
| GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 14x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 67% - Good | Total price: $69 |