Acer Predator PH315-53

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.99% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemAcer Predator PH315-53  (all builds)
MotherboardCML QX50_CMS
Memory24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210821
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 11 '23 at 16:35
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Memory 73.9
1-Core 120
2-Core 240
79% 145 Pts
4-Core 447
8-Core 764
74% 606 Pts
64-Core 878
54% 878 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 1441) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8280
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.99% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 9.2
Parallax 8.2
5% 7.8 fps
MRender 11
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 11.2
8% 9.77 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.99%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512G-1014 512GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11101100
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,592
Write 2,016
Mixed 1,706
398% 1,771 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 88.6
4K Mixed 53
172% 59.7 MB/s
DQ Read 714
DQ Write 517
DQ Mixed 588
447% 606 MB/s
Poor: 116% Great: 239%
Fikwot FN955 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: SN13683
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2142 2070 2124 2034 2164 2202 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
309% Outstanding
Read 2,062
Write 2,168
Mixed 1,890
SusWrite 2,123
465% 2,061 MB/s
4K Read 49.7
4K Write 97.6
4K Mixed 64.8
210% 70.7 MB/s
DQ Read 811
DQ Write 592
DQ Mixed 689
518% 697 MB/s
Poor: 309%
This bench: 309%
Great: 630%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM DDR4 3200 C22 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
82.6% Excellent
MC Read 31.2
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 25.8
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 34.2
SC Mixed 24.3
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 76
53% 76 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 144 15.5" 1536 793 BOE08B3
Typical Predator PH315-53 Builds (Compare 6,160 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH315-53

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback