Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231005
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 12 '23 at 09:55
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel N95
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Memory 63.7
1-Core 103
2-Core 171
64% 112 Pts
4-Core 279
8-Core 279
37% 279 Pts
64-Core 285
18% 285 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 7270) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4575
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
3.52% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 6.6
Parallax 4.4
3% 4.93 fps
MRender 8
Gravity 7.5
Splatting 1.9
4% 5.8 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.52%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Yhjc YHS200A256HI27 256GB
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0201A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 367 390 374 434 440 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Read 424
Write 369
Mixed 363
SusWrite 399
88% 389 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 77.5
4K Mixed 25.5
113% 43 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 44.8
90% 177 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KINSOTIN8GB2666MHZ 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
43.4% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 15.4
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 10.5
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 2 60 23" 1280 720 PHLC069 Philips 234EL
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,830 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback