Asus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 113%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 119%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics94% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive392% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory22.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231007
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 14 '23 at 15:22
Run Duration318 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$320
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
119% Outstanding
Memory 94.3
1-Core 198
2-Core 392
121% 228 Pts
4-Core 766
8-Core 1,205
121% 985 Pts
64-Core 1,741
108% 1,741 Pts
Poor: 102%
This bench: 119%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$330
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.12.1
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
94% Outstanding
Lighting 94.3
Reflection 133
Parallax 180
77% 136 fps
MRender 210
Gravity 92.7
Splatting 164
127% 156 fps
Poor: 79%
This bench: 94%
Great: 93%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000P3PSSD8 1TB
838GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4268 2859 921 644 336 383 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
392% Outstanding
Read 2203
Write 4,405
Mixed 2,682
SusWrite 1,568
616% 2,715 MB/s
4K Read 74.3
4K Write 314
4K Mixed 111
421% 166 MB/s
DQ Read 1,915
DQ Write 1,625
DQ Mixed 1,748
1,315% 1,763 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 392%
Great: 441%
Fikwot FN950 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: SN12362
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3809 3714 3714 3706 3714 3548 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
560% Outstanding
Read 4,009
Write 3,935
Mixed 2,757
SusWrite 3,701
810% 3,601 MB/s
4K Read 62.4
4K Write 240
4K Mixed 91.5
339% 131 MB/s
DQ Read 1,838
DQ Write 1,322
DQ Mixed 1,440
1,114% 1,533 MB/s
Poor: 245%
This bench: 560%
Great: 560%
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$53
263GB free
Firmware: 42B2S7JA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 477 475 478 341 473 476 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
237% Outstanding
Read 2,537
Write 478
Mixed 615
SusWrite 453
221% 1,021 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 204
4K Mixed 63.5
255% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 888
DQ Write 480
DQ Mixed 579
458% 649 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 237%
Great: 311%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$76
181GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 495 494 492 493 491 493 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 488
Mixed 416
SusWrite 493
107% 475 MB/s
4K Read 45.8
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 61.8
215% 77.7 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 370
279% 373 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 134%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
121GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 159 163 161 164 166 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
60% Good
Read 47.9
Write 99.2
Mixed 80
SusWrite 161
72% 97.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
84% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 60%
Great: 90%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
11GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 121 116 128 145 157 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 121
Write 113
Mixed 31.1
SusWrite 138
73% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
200% Outstanding
MC Read 79.6
MC Write 66
MC Mixed 72.9
208% 72.8 GB/s
SC Read 67.6
SC Write 62.6
SC Mixed 63.5
184% 64.6 GB/s
Latency 57.6
69% 57.6 ns
Poor: 142%
This bench: 200%
Great: 199%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 144 23.8" 1280 720 AOC2402 24G2W1G4
Typical TUF GAMING B650-PLUS Builds (Compare 177 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 197%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $1,100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback