Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics49.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 months ago, 4 months ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200107
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 15 '23 at 21:58
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 71%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT-$359
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
59.8% Above average
Memory 61.2
1-Core 101
2-Core 197
66% 120 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 578
53% 446 Pts
64-Core 448
28% 448 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$240
Gigabyte(1458 4014) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.23
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.3% Average
Lighting 50
Reflection 46.3
Parallax 39.8
41% 45.4 fps
MRender 104
Gravity 75.6
Splatting 68.9
66% 82.7 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNVS1000GB 1TB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8442101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 244 690 15 457 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Read 798
Write 903
Mixed 569
SusWrite 255
142% 631 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 60
4K Mixed 13
77% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 616
DQ Write 537
DQ Mixed 426
360% 526 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 228%
Shark Gaming 480GB SSD
29GB free
Firmware: S1128B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 253 18 77 11 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Read 364
Write 317
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 93.1
44% 198 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 13.7
4K Mixed 0.4
27% 9.03 MB/s
DQ Read 103
DQ Write 15.8
DQ Mixed 0.4
15% 39.7 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/16GX 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
55.7% Above average
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 23.1
59% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 15.3
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 40 16 144 27" 1280 720 SAM105C LC27G7xT
Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,067 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $347
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback