Alienware m18 R1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics8.59% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive277% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemAlienware m18 R1  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0DYWHJ
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 16 '23 at 19:01
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Memory 63.5
1-Core 200
2-Core 334
104% 199 Pts
4-Core 660
8-Core 992
103% 826 Pts
64-Core 1,858
115% 1,858 Pts
Poor: 106%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Dell(1028 0C48) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4575
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
8.59% Terrible
Lighting 9.7
Reflection 14.7
Parallax 11.1
8% 11.8 fps
MRender 13.3
Gravity 12.6
Splatting 11
10% 12.3 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.59%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme PM9A1 Samsung 1024GB
887GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 36310229 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2762 2382 2668 2670 1984 1594 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
277% Outstanding
Read 1,461
Write 2,609
Mixed 1,527
SusWrite 2,344
452% 1,985 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 67
4K Mixed 42
143% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 766
DQ Write 628
DQ Mixed 694
520% 696 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 277%
Great: 444%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMCG78AGBSA092N 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
124% Outstanding
MC Read 53.6
MC Write 47.5
MC Mixed 47.8
142% 49.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 18.6
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 124%
This bench: 124%
Great: 178%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 480 18" 1280 720 BOE0B03
Typical m18 R1 Builds (Compare 571 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 232%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 281%
UFO

System: Alienware m18 R1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback