Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 113%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics82.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive388% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory29 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231007
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 17 '23 at 00:12
Run Duration317 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$459
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Memory 90.5
1-Core 193
2-Core 372
116% 218 Pts
4-Core 725
8-Core 1,179
116% 952 Pts
64-Core 1,740
108% 1,740 Pts
Poor: 110%
This bench: 113%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$245
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.12.1
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.8% Excellent
Lighting 82.5
Reflection 127
Parallax 159
67% 123 fps
MRender 184
Gravity 85.4
Splatting 145
113% 138 fps
Poor: 79%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 93%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000P3PSSD8 1TB
626GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR411
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4143 3143 1693 1536 821 752 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
388% Outstanding
Read 2,140
Write 4,347
Mixed 2,676
SusWrite 2,015
635% 2,794 MB/s
4K Read 66.7
4K Write 194
4K Mixed 106
339% 122 MB/s
DQ Read 1,928
DQ Write 1,377
DQ Mixed 1,705
1,259% 1,670 MB/s
Poor: 120%
This bench: 388%
Great: 419%
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$62
440GB free
Firmware: 42B2S7JA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 478 474 476 478 479 479 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
239% Outstanding
Read 2,526
Write 480
Mixed 631
SusWrite 477
223% 1,028 MB/s
4K Read 43.7
4K Write 210
4K Mixed 64.1
259% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 880
DQ Write 484
DQ Mixed 576
457% 647 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 239%
Great: 311%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
122GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 474 374 291 312 303 303 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 483
Mixed 416
SusWrite 343
98% 435 MB/s
4K Read 45.2
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 57.6
211% 77.6 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 369
278% 372 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 123%
Great: 134%
Fikwot FN950 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: SN12362
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3766 3599 3522 3613 3692 3591 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
550% Outstanding
Read 3,923
Write 3,869
Mixed 2,700
SusWrite 3,630
795% 3,531 MB/s
4K Read 59.5
4K Write 221
4K Mixed 87.7
320% 123 MB/s
DQ Read 1,964
DQ Write 1,352
DQ Mixed 1,472
1,149% 1,596 MB/s
Poor: 280%
This bench: 550%
Great: 550%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$82
121GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 159 160 161 163 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Read 111
Write 140
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 160
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
59% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 90%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$35
11GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 115 121 128 132 145 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 120
Write 102
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 132
70% 96.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
189% Outstanding
MC Read 75.6
MC Write 65.7
MC Mixed 68.2
200% 69.8 GB/s
SC Read 56.7
SC Write 58.6
SC Mixed 58
165% 57.8 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 142%
This bench: 189%
Great: 197%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 144 23.8" 1280 720 AOC2402 24G2W1G4
Typical TUF GAMING B650-PLUS Builds (Compare 252 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 218%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 222%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 115% - Outstanding Total price: $1,049
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback