HP 250 15.6 inch G9 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 250 15.6 inch G9 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8A1E
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230824
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 17 '23 at 19:15
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N4500
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
28.1% Poor
Memory 45.8
1-Core 60.3
2-Core 63
36% 56.4 Pts
4-Core 62.1
8-Core 66.6
8% 64.3 Pts
64-Core 65.6
4% 65.6 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 8A1E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2121
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
2.53% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 3
2% 2.9 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 2.8
Splatting 4
3% 3.63 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.53%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg50znv256g KIOXIA 256GB
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP02AN00
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 485
Write 462
Mixed 392
100% 446 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 26.6
4K Mixed 17.6
60% 19.9 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 80.5
DQ Mixed 90.7
70% 95.2 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 240%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44CB0-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.6% Poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 7.4
22% 7.57 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 8.8
23% 8.1 GB/s
Latency 173
23% 173 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 62 51 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO499F
Typical 250 15.6 inch G9 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 482 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP 250 15.6 inch G9 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback