Biostar H310MHP

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive34.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardBiostar H310MHP  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191230
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 26 '23 at 19:24
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User BLR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Memory 90.1
1-Core 119
2-Core 240
84% 150 Pts
4-Core 461
8-Core 598
68% 530 Pts
64-Core 693
43% 693 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD-240 240GB
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM71.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 194 32 64 6.7 121 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Read 303
Write 66.9
Mixed 84.7
SusWrite 84.4
29% 135 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 19.6
4K Mixed 9.9
42% 13.9 MB/s
DQ Read 14
DQ Write 213
DQ Mixed 167
113% 131 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 94%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 182 181 182 182 182 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 172
Mixed 37.8
SusWrite 182
101% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
160% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 101%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.C8FD1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
82.2% Excellent
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 23.4
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 31.2
SC Mixed 23.5
69% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 66.1
60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 35: 0P 2R 1G 22B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
35% 31% 80 211 59 144 0" 1280 720
Typical H310MHP Builds (Compare 1,032 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Biostar H310MHP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $298
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback