Today's hottest deals

Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M6500XV_M6500XV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (2nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 98 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics18% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M6500XV_M6500XV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M6500XV
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230523
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 27 '23 at 19:53
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Memory 27.2
1-Core 67.9
2-Core 129
39% 74.7 Pts
4-Core 226
8-Core 417
38% 322 Pts
64-Core 686
42% 686 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M
Asus(1043 3258) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.40.03.38
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
18% Very poor
Lighting 20.8
Reflection 18.9
Parallax 38.2
17% 26 fps
MRender 12.9
Gravity 25.2
Splatting 31.7
20% 23.3 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18%
Great: 54%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL4512HBLU 512GB
417GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HXC70W1Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,384
Write 881
Mixed 1,070
246% 1,112 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 51.9
4K Mixed 41.3
138% 43.8 MB/s
DQ Read 418
DQ Write 146
DQ Mixed 378
254% 314 MB/s
Poor: 95% Great: 347%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MT62F1G32D2DS-026 WT 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB 23h clocked @ 5500 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
MC Read 36.6
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 43.6
95% 33.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 15.5
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 265
15% 265 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 144 15.5" 1280 720 CMN1556 N156HMA-GA1
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M6500XV_M6500XV Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M6500XV_M6500XV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback