Acer Nitro AN515-47

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics38.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-47  (all builds)
MotherboardRB Jimny_RBH
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230615
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 03 '24 at 22:04
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS Graphics
FP7, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 69.2
1-Core 65.9
2-Core 148
55% 94.4 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 548
52% 431 Pts
64-Core 537
33% 537 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050 (Laptop)
Acer(1025 159E) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.28
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
38.7% Below average
Lighting 48.8
Reflection 55.2
Parallax 45.1
40% 49.7 fps
MRender 44.9
Gravity 42.7
Splatting 46.1
37% 44.6 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 65%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS512GEJ9X125N 512GB
392GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51022A20
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,899
Write 1,731
Mixed 1,491
380% 1,707 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 93.8
4K Mixed 61.3
194% 66.2 MB/s
DQ Read 815
DQ Write 394
DQ Mixed 647
469% 619 MB/s
Poor: 204% Great: 420%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AI1V56WC8W1-B1CS 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.1% Above average
MC Read 24.1
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 20
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 15.9
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 28: 0P 3R 2G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
28% 32% 38 201 51 144 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0B02
Typical Nitro AN515-47 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Acer Nitro AN515-47

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback