Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	62.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS Graphics 2,625 User benchmarks, average bench 82% FP7, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	95.3% Outstanding	Memory 77.4 1-Core 160 2-Core 317 98% 185 Pts	4-Core 607 8-Core 949 96% 778 Pts	64-Core 1081 67% 1081 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 95.3% Great: 96%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050 (Laptop) 60,311 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Acer(1025 159E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.92 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	62.6% Good	Lighting 82.9 Reflection 77.5 Parallax 71.7 68% 77.4 fps	MRender 72.8 Gravity 61.5 Splatting 61.3 53% 65.2 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 65%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS512GEJ9X125N 512GB 151 User benchmarks, average bench 313% 388GB free (System drive) Firmware: 51022A20 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 4,222 Write 3,388 Mixed 2,411 740% 3,340 MB/s	4K Read 58 4K Write 135 4K Mixed 78.1 259% 90.3 MB/s	DQ Read 952 DQ Write 516 DQ Mixed 804 579% 758 MB/s
Poor: 204% Great: 420%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata AI1V56WC8W1-B1CS 1x8GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz Performing below potential (98^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	75.1% Very good	MC Read 29.5 MC Write 26.3 MC Mixed 22.9 75% 26.2 GB/s	SC Read 26 SC Write 30.8 SC Mixed 21.7 75% 26.2 GB/s	Latency 85.3 47% 85.3 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 75%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	66	52	75	21.5"	1280 720	WAN2150 MGN-002-21S

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 27%

Raft

CPU
Ryzen 5 7535HS GraphicsAMDBench 82%, 2,625 samples	12x
Ryzen 7 7735HSAMDBench 79%, 3,338 samples	5x

GPU
Radeon GraphicsAMDBench 27%, 25,679 samples	12x
RTX 3050 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 56%, 60,311 samples	2x

SSD
HFS512GEJ9X125N 512GBBench 313%, 151 samples	7x
MZVL2512HCJQ-00B07 512GBSamsungBench 306%, 411 samples	6x
NE-128 128GBBench 119%, 3,172 samples	1x

RAM
MTC4C10163S1SC48BA1 1x8GBMicronBench 64%, 906 samples	3x
AI1V56WC8W1-B1CS 1x8GBAdataBench 67%, 25 samples	2x
MTC8C1084S1SC48BA1 1x16GBMicronBench 71%, 3,017 samples	1x