Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B75M-D3V  (all builds)
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131023
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 08 '24 at 19:28
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
67.2% Good
Memory 85.2
1-Core 90.5
2-Core 179
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 300
39% 292 Pts
64-Core 296
18% 296 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 3GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.39% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 2.1
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.7 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2
2% 2.13 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.39%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
JASTER-240 240GB
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1102A1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 22 99 20 44 17 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53% Above average
Read 415
Write 341
Mixed 307
SusWrite 89.3
64% 288 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 62.3
4K Mixed 20.1
93% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 25.4
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 23.6
31% 53.2 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 53%
Great: 53%
Seagate ST2000VX015-2XG102 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: CV11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 127 126 131 127 130 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 14.2
Write 103
Mixed 40.3
SusWrite 125
52% 70.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.3
88% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-014.A00LF 9905584-027.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.3% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 13.2
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 12
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 39 32 60 21.7" 1280 720 GSM5B54 LG FULL HD
Typical GA-B75M-D3V Builds (Compare 1,419 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback