Today's hottest deals

Intel HM570

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics72.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive233% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardIntel HM570  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220614
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJan 12 '24 at 21:19
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel 0000
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Memory 65.9
1-Core 145
2-Core 267
85% 159 Pts
4-Core 496
8-Core 842
81% 669 Pts
64-Core 1,164
72% 1,164 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$282
Nvidia(10DE 2503) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 537.13
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.9% Very good
Lighting 91.8
Reflection 82.3
Parallax 82.7
75% 85.6 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 70.8
Splatting 61.8
69% 88.8 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 106%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Erying NVME 3.0 1TB
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H220906a Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1244 1074 712 617 306 283 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
233% Outstanding
Read 1,872
Write 1,901
Mixed 1,542
SusWrite 706
338% 1,506 MB/s
4K Read 45.6
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 63
224% 82.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,269
DQ Write 779
DQ Mixed 720
618% 922 MB/s
Poor: 233%
This bench: 233%
Great: 352%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6H1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
73.5% Very good
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 24.5
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 18.1
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 60 23" 1280 720 SAM071D SMBX2350
Typical HM570 Builds (Compare 897 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel HM570

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 177% - Outstanding Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback