| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 81.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 38.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Micro-Star MS-7C51 |
| Motherboard | MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20230508 |
| Uptime | 4.4 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 18 '24 at 00:09 |
| Run Duration | 136 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 15% |
PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
69.9%
Good
|
71% 129 Pts
|
61% 501 Pts
|
53% 852 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324
Zotac(19DA 6527) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
81.6%
Excellent
|
84% 105 fps
|
78% 97.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata SU630 240GB
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X14c18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 38 26 29 28 32 MB/s
|
38.9%
Below average
|
22% 97.3 MB/s
|
78% 33.3 MB/s
|
81% 118 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45
686GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 158 165 160 153 167 MB/s
|
79.4%
Very good
|
74% 103 MB/s
|
149% 1.13 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial CT16G4DFRA266.M8FB 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
|
37%
Below average
|
36% 12.6 GB/s
|
32% 11.2 GB/s
|
44% 91.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 0% | 1 | 195 | 26 | 60 | 23.8" | 1920 1080 | HKC2431 24E3 |
Typical A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) Builds (Compare 3,854 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 533x |
| Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 479x |
| Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 386x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 312x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 227x |
| GTX 1660Nvidia $143Bench 68%, 230,793 samples | 222x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 76% - Very good | Total price: $305 |