Asus T100HAN

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive13.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemAsus T100HAN  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK T100HAN
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display800 x 1280 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160518
Uptime18 Days
Run DateJan 08 '18 at 23:36
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom x5-Z8500
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.45 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
24.4% Poor
Memory 39.8
1-Core 19.1
2-Core 36.5
22% 31.8 Pts
4-Core 53.2
8-Core 53.2
7% 53.2 Pts
64-Core 55.2
3% 55.2 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 31%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Asus(1043 1BDD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4308
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.36% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 2.23
Parallax 1.81
1% 1.78 fps
MRender 2.38
Gravity 1.27
Splatting 3.13
2% 2.26 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.36%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung DWBD3R 125GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0.0
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 89.9
Write 8.79
Mixed 16.8
8% 38.5 MB/s
4K Read 9.62
4K Write 12.7
4K Mixed 4.84
28% 9.05 MB/s
DQ Read 42.5
DQ Write 18.8
DQ Mixed 4.96
10% 22.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
17.9% Very poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 6.9
19% 6.67 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 2.7
9% 3.07 GB/s
Latency 203
20% 203 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback